---
title: OMG I hate HPV!
description: OMG I hate HPV!
---

<https://www.viroxanimalhealth.com/resources>

# [OMG I hate HPV!](https://www.viroxanimalhealth.com/resources/talkcleantome/2016/02/omg-i-hate-hpv.html)

 Written by [Nicole Kenny](https://www.viroxanimalhealth.com/resources/author/nicole-kenny) | Feb 12, 2016 5:05:00 PM

<http://static1.squarespace.com/static/595689fc9de4bbc892200518/t/59568ac85fd63b5f29287673/1498845315534//img.png.com/static/595689fc9de4bbc892200518/t/59568ac85fd63b5f29287674/1498843848973/1000w/>

I rarely use the Talk Clean To Me blog as a means to vent,  
 but I just can’t keep quiet any longer on this topic.   Over the last *several*  months there has been increasing chatter about the need to  
 find a product that carries an [HPV](http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/stdfact-hpv.htm)  claim as a result of [a  
 published study](http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/02/04/jac.dku006.abstract)   looking at the  
 efficacy of some disinfectants against HPV.    
I can certainly understand the interest in reading such a study;  
 however, like any published work we need to understand the limitations of the  
 study and how that can be applied to your infection prevention practice.

My intent is not to disparage the study.  However, as I have expertise in the  
 requirements for registering disinfectants with the EPA, the FDA and Health  
 Canada, I hope I can shed a bit of light on the topic so that you do not waste your  
 time trying to find a disinfectant with an HPV claim.  The following are the questions I ask when  
 reading a study and determining its relevance:

1) Question:       Were the disinfectants used  
 representative of commonly used products for disinfection of environmental  
 surfaces or medical devices? 

    Answer:           The study did not include many of the  
 more commonly used disinfectant actives such as [QUATs](http://talkcleantome.blogspot.ca/2012/01/disinfectant-chemistry-report-card-do.html)  
 or the up and coming [Improved  
 Hydrogen Peroxide](http://talkcleantome.blogspot.ca/2012/11/disinfectant-chemistry-report-card-10.html) products.

2) Question:       Would the testing methodology used in the  
 study allow for the product(s) to be registered by the appropriate regulatory  
 body?

    Answer:           The [efficacy  
 method](http://www.accuratuslabs.com/astm-e1053-standard-test-method-for-efficacy-of-virucidal-agents-intended-for-inanimate-environmental-surfaces-3/) used in the study was not equivalent to what a disinfectant  
 manufacturer would have to conduct and submit to EPA, FDA or Health Canada in  
 order to make a claim of efficacy against HPV.

3) Question:       Are there any labs accredited by the EPA,  
 the FDA or Health Canada that can conduct testing against HPV to allow for  
 registration of a claim?

     Answer:          No.   
 An investigation of EPA, FDA and Health Canada accredited labs confirmed  
 that there are currently no labs that can grow HPV in a lab setting to a  
 sufficient enough titre that would allow for submission of such a claim.

[Like HPV](https://www.viroxanimalhealth.com/hubfs/PTSHH0151.008.2015_HPV.pdf),  
 there are a number of pathogens that cannot be cultured in a lab and therefore  
 cannot be tested for efficacy. Generally, regulatory bodies recommend that when  
 testing for efficacy against these kinds of pathogens, surrogate organisms with  
 similar characteristics are used. For example, Human Norovirus, like HPV,  
 cannot be cultured in a lab; however, regulatory bodies have instead identified  
 Feline Calicivirus (FCV) as the surrogate that has similar qualities to Norovirus.  
 Therefore, if products can prove effectiveness against FCV, a Norovirus  
 efficacy claim can be made. This same concept cannot be used for HPV however;  
 regulatory bodies have not yet identified an appropriate surrogate as there is  
 no Health Canada, EPA or FDA approved test method for HPV. Therefore,  
 disinfectant companies cannot make an HPV efficacy claim on their product  
 labels.

Although this study appears to have compelling evidence, one  
 must take into consideration the science behind disinfectant claims and what  
 current guidelines allow. Although there are no approved test methods for HPV  
 and there are no current disinfectants on the market that have claims for HPV,  
 it is logical to assume that disinfectants with multiple claims against  
 non-enveloped viruses could be effective against HPV.

Climbing down from my soapbox....thanks for reading!

*Bugging Off!*

Nicole 

[View full post](https://www.viroxanimalhealth.com/resources/talkcleantome/2016/02/omg-i-hate-hpv.html)

```json
{
  "@context" : "http://schema.org",
  "@type" : "BlogPosting",
  "author" : {
    "@type" : "Person",
    "name" : "Nicole Kenny"
  },
  "dateModified" : "2019-03-04T15:23:21.928Z",
  "datePublished" : "2016-02-12T17:05:00Z",
  "headline" : "OMG I hate HPV!",
  "image" : {
    "@type" : "ImageObject",
    "height" : 60,
    "url" : "/hs/hsstatic/content_shared_assets/static-1.4092/img/default-amp-logo.png",
    "width" : 60
  },
  "mainEntityOfPage" : "https://www.viroxanimalhealth.com/resources/talkcleantome/2016/02/omg-i-hate-hpv.html",
  "publisher" : {
    "@type" : "Organization",
    "logo" : {
      "@type" : "ImageObject",
      "height" : 60,
      "url" : "/hs/hsstatic/content_shared_assets/static-1.4092/img/default-amp-logo.png",
      "width" : 60
    },
    "name" : "Virox-Animal-Health-Resources"
  }
}
```